Search for: "Long v. State" Results 4341 - 4360 of 45,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
 Together with The Picasso Project, the Zervos has been the subject of a long legal battle which ended last week with a decision of the the United States District Court Northern District of California San Jose Division.BackgroundIn 1979, Yves Sicre de Fontbrune, the original plaintiff in the case, acquired Cahiers d’art and the rights to the Zervos.In 1995 Wofsy published The Picasso Project.In 1996, after copies of two volumes of The Picasso Project were… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
And Article 24 required Member States for provide for sanctions for breach of implementing legislation. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:56 am by Kara M. Maciel
Simply stated, in the private club industry, a little “discrimination” can go a long way in avoiding potential lawsuits based on discrimination! [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:51 pm
AP is reporting that the State of Utah has made its mark in the States v Feds immigration controversy by passing a law similar to the Arizona Immigration Law with one huge exception. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) [Germany][Petition granted] [Habitual residence]   In Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) Asli Baz, a citizen of Germany, filed suit seeking to compel Anthony Patterson, a citizen of the United States, to return their six-year-old son, A.P., from Illinois to Germany. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 10:00 am by David Oliver
Dixon to be one of the best (and by that we meant most thoughtful, well-reasoned and game-changing) opinions in a long time the Maryland Supreme Court's follow-up in Georgia-Pacific v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As to the analysis:first, whether the forum state’s long-arm statute permits service of process and, second,whether the assertion of jurisdiction is consistent with due process.Elecs. for Imaging, Inc. v. [read post]