Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4341 - 4360
of 21,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
in the case of Bywater v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 7:35 pm
Liao has not yet answered the ABA’s complaint.The case cite is American Board of Anesthesiology, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:38 am
Thursday could mark a tipping point in the "automotive patent wars. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am
Anderson: States cannot disqualify candidates for federal offices from the ballot under Section 3. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:34 pm
See also Kraus v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Mark J.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:16 am
Hyperheal sued, asserting various state law and trademark claims. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:39 am
This year marks the fifth legislative session in which Texas lawmakers have failed to pass legislation to establish procedures to memorialize Atkins v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
In The Law Society v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:48 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:24 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:24 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:01 am
” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)); Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:33 am
" Interesting use of quotation marks around the word "hired," isn't it? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
These conditions are also cumulative (Gateway v OHIM, C‑57/08 P). [read post]
