Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 4341 - 4360 of 11,347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Charles Barzun Without question the most important thing about the Dobbsdecision is its dramatic impact on the availability of abortion access for women in huge swaths of the country. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am by Michael C. Dorf
However, the district court found, as a factual matter, that this was not true. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
 It is a matter of great happiness to the IPKat and Merpel that these posts have been so well received. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In other words, there is no administrative law principle equivalent to the notice-and-comment procedure in these countries (or even in the EU for that matter). [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 6:45 am
As is to be expected, the White House has been silent on the matter. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
The motive, rather, could only have been to defeat Judge Thomas’ nomination. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 5:01 am by Thomas Lee and Jesse Egbert
More and more, judges are seeing the assessment of ordinary meaning as an empirical matter—an inquiry into the way legal words or phrases are commonly used by the public. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am by Neil Hamilton and Louis Bilionis
[click on to enlarge]Recent changes in ABA accreditation standards are an opportunity to deepen and broaden U.S. legal education in ways that matter to students, employers, and broader society. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:18 pm by Marty Lederman
 As the brief for Thomas Aquinas College puts it:  "Plaintiffs’ insurance company or TPA will provide the objectionable coverage to Plaintiffs’ employees only by virtue of [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:06 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Alito (joined in this respect by both Justices Thomas and Gorsuch) argues that EMTALA never requires abortions. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Sure, there are some matters that are too trivial to bother including in a Constitution or that could backfire. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
. -- Justices Thomas and Alito dissented.The  punch line of the dissent is in the last paragraph:  Although it relied on expert testimony to understand  the science underlying petitioners'  claims, the District Court made no findings of fact as that term is used in Rule 52(a)(6).The opinion by Teva's expert is, as a factual matter, clearly erroneous. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  That fixation on these matters is rhetoric rather than reality becomes clear only when the purpose of the constitutional or political conversation changes. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Thomas wrote a dissent concerning the increasing use of nationwide injunctions. [read post]