Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 4341 - 4360 of 15,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm by royblack
But the threat of violence will tip the balance, see Lozano v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:23 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “President Biden warned President Vladimir V. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm by Shea Denning
If IRCA bars the States from using all such information for any purpose, whether Congress has the constitutional power to so broadly preempt the States from exercising their traditional police powers to prosecute state law crimes. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:26 am by SHG
The 4th Circuit's decision came in a little-noticed drug case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:44 am by Julia Kaye
Politicians are relentless in their attacks, but a majority of this country believes that people must have the power to make personal decisions during pregnancy. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:00 am by Annemarie Bridy
Turow, who is currently President of the Authors Guild, took to The Times to criticize the Supreme Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:22 pm by Amy Howe
ShareLess than two years ago, the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:14 am by davidharrisauthor
In my last post, I discussed the legal basis for the court’s decision in Floyd v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:48 am by Ray Mullman
See attached Pennsylvania Superior Court case called Walton v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:14 am by davidharrisauthor
In my last post, I discussed the legal basis for the court’s decision in Floyd v. [read post]
Dr Yunupingu claimed the Commonwealth has an obligation “to compensate Yolngu peoples for the extinguishment or impairment of their traditional title to land on the Gove Peninsula in North East Arnhem Land” under the Native Title Act 1993. [read post]