Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 178,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 1:22 pm
No single practitioner should be liable for more than $500,000 — regardless of how many plaintiffs. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
The primary debate is whether the Court’s ruling places an undue burden on plaintiffs under the rule of reason paradigm to meet its burden of production to establish harm to competition. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:38 am
Murguia held the district correctly concluded the plaintiffs argument of first amendment issues was likely to fail and affirmed the lower courts decision. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Judge Brantley Starr’s decision in Bowman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Judge Brantley Starr’s decision in Bowman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:08 am
Under New York state law, a plaintiff is required to include a claim upon which the plaintiff is entitled to relief. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:29 am
The plaintiff knew about the risk of ejection and chose to ride the bus anyway.TWEET FOR THE ROADI don't know why I find it hilarious that Hershey has in-house counsel separated by whether they handle salty snacks or sweet snacks but I do find it hilarious. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:55 am
In 2015, MLFA partnered with Morgan & Morgan, the largest plaintiff’s law firm in the country, which had brought a civil action against the United States on Mr. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 am
Cal.) -- denying plaintiff’s request for an award of attorney’s fees and costs because even if he were eligible, which the court doubted, plaintiff did not meet the entitlement prong because his interest in obtaining agency records “relevant to a tort claim he is considering filing does not implicate any significant public interests . . . . [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
” The girlfriend was allowed to leave with the car and the defendant’s cell phone. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:08 am
Additionally, the court found the allegations in the plaintiff’s complaint regarding the federal defendants to be vague and lacking credibility. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
If the plaintiff declines a timely offer from the defendant and subsequently receives a judgment at trial that isn’t more favorable than the defendant’s offer, the plaintiff must “pay the defendant’s costs from the time of the offer. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
Third , it put its own ruling on hold for seven days—to give the federal government and the private plaintiffs time to ask the Supreme Court to step in and keep SB4 on hold. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:03 am
From yesterday's opinion by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn (S.D.N.Y.) in Nunes v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:41 am
” “The ABA’s recently released Formal Opinion 506, opens new tab addresses a lawyer’s ethical obligations when delegating specific prospective client intake tasks to a nonlawyer… For mass tort attorneys seeking to retain clients and avoid potential legal pitfalls, a comprehensive understanding of Formal Opinion 506 is crucial. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:32 am
The plaintiff was a California resident at the time she commenced the underlying action. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
These provisions required the board to obtain the founder’s consent before taking various actions, limited the board’s discretion over the board’s size and composition, and required the board to ensure significant founder representation on all committees. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
These provisions required the board to obtain the founder’s consent before taking various actions, limited the board’s discretion over the board’s size and composition, and required the board to ensure significant founder representation on all committees. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
Judge Sullivan dissents, stating that this was really a hybrid Article 78 proceeding that has res judicata effect on plaintiff's federal lawsuit because plaintiff did seek damages in the Article 78 that were not incidental to the primary relief that he sought. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
”Following that incident, said the court, "AFD determined that [Plaintiff’s] promotion to battalion chief would undermine the AFD’s internal morale and its public perception, as well as [Plaintiff’s] effectiveness as a leader. [read post]
