Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 17,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 9:40 am
In order for an out-of-state conviction to count as a prior conviction in New Jersey, the other state’s statute must be substantially similar to the New Jersey DWI statute. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 8:19 am
No one told SCOTUS about Hernandez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:33 am
From today's Supreme Court opinion holding that a judge's vote may not be counted in an opinion released two weeks after his death.From Yovino v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:10 am
In Rotkiske v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Hoda Muthana, from the United States, and Shamima Begum, from the United Kingdom, both married Islamic State fighters and had children in Syria. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 10:23 am
Section 230 * Weimer v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 2:35 pm
The most famous recent example is NFIB v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 2:00 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm
Vázquez, Choice-of-Law Rules as Geographic Scope Limitations Philippa Webb, Forum non Conveniens: Recent Developments at the Intersection of Public and Private International Law W. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 2:48 am
Connolly in Deere & Company v AGCO Corp. et al., Civil Action No. 18-827-CFC (D.Del. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:57 am
So, the full case against Times v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 10:12 am
Marital property v. separate property. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Chris Hoofnagle, they chose opt-out to avoid the IMS v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:19 am
Goins, 516 F.3d 416 (6th Cir. 2008)United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 12:22 pm
Swahn, Jr. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm
The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
For instance, in Qualcomm v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 3:48 am
State, Cause 14-12-01035-CR, Tex. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
