Search for: "State v. Plan" Results 4341 - 4360 of 29,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2018, 11:59 am by Sandy
  The Act allows Abbott to label its formula organic pursuant to a certified organic plan. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The North Carolina Supreme Court yesterday issued an order (full text) in Hart v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:20 pm by CAFE
Harper, a case that could determine whether state courts have the power to review election rules passed by state legislatures.Stay informed. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
The draft explicitly reversed Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:12 pm by Josh Blackman
ROSKE also stated that he used Reddit, Google, and other online forums to learn the skills he thought were necessary to complete his plan. . . . [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:39 pm
Deeds not words: Let's have some action on prisoners voting rightsRobert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what plans he has to extend voting rights to sentenced prisoners in England and Wales. [218573]Bridget Prentice: Following the European Court of Human Rights' judgment in the case of Hirst v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by gstasiewicz
” Specifically, Judicial Watch is investigating an alleged plan by the Obama administration to suspend deportations of illegal aliens who are in the country unlawfully (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:51 pm
As Judge O’Toole’s opinion in Columbia Air Services v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by INFORRM
Along the way, Spaw heard them talking about innocuous subjects such as their children’s activities, taking a nap, and evening plans. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by admin
Risman & Risman, P.C. and their co-counsel are representing plaintiffs in Farah v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:57 am by Viking
While the rule appears to allow a broad exception for hearsay, the Supreme Court of VA points out the narrowing language still has effect.* Tucker v. [read post]