Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 4341 - 4360 of 36,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm by Christopher Lund
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am by CMS
However, his attention had not been drawn to sub-section 2 of section 160A which states: “The court must not exercise the power conferred by sub-section 1 unless it gives to anyone who the court thinks is, or may be, a person holding an interest in the property a reasonable opportunity to make representations to it. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
The first is to hold that the power to search incident to arrest generally includes the power to search cell phones, provided that the search is truly incidental to the arrest: R. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
Una norma constitucional jurisprudencial es retroactiva si “narrow[s] the scope of a criminal statute by interpreting its term” y “place particular conduct or persons covered by the statute beyond the state’s power to punish”. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:54 pm by heralddigital
It is divided into the following books: (a) Book I – sovereignty and general provisions; (b) Book II – the distribution of powers of government; (c) Book III- the Office of the President; (d) Book IV – the executive branch of government; (e) Book V – the Constitutional Commissions; (f) Book VI – national government budgeting; and (g) Book VII – administrative procedure. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:13 am by Jessica Jones
The Supreme Court has given judgment in R (on the application of Maughan) v HM Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire [2020] UKSC 46, a case dealing with the applicable standard of proof for reaching a narrative verdict of suicide or unlawful killing. [read post]
The sanction was imposed under the court’s inherent power to manage its own affairs, and specifically to sanction misconduct by an attorney that involves that attorney’s violation of a court order or other misconduct that is not undertaken for the client’s benefit (quoting United States v. [read post]