Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 57,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
That, the Court said, is a critical aspect of the right to be tried by a jury. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:51 am
[7] West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:36 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
Further, said the court, even had the faculty member Article 78 action “been timely commenced, the record demonstrates that the [College President] substantially complied with the internal rules of Purchase College, State University of New York and the determination was not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
Matter of Potter v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
Jul. 22, 2013) and Prather v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:53 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:23 pm
In PLIVA v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am
Should it stay that way, the Epic v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:35 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:57 am
Lawsuit dismissed for failure to specify the acts or omissions of unlawful discrimination underlying the complaintRoth v State University of New York, et. al., 61 AD3d 476Jeffrey Roth sued SUNY’s State College of Optometry and named individuals, alleging he was the victim of unlawful discrimination. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:27 pm
It's hard to conceive of a more unlikely Business Court case than Keister v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 6:28 am
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 11:24 am
But in a new opinion released Oct. 11 in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
In Grant v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
In Grant v. [read post]
