Search for: "Town v. State"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 5,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
In Town of Apex v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:33 am
Abolishing a full-time position in favor of two part-time positions and the Doctrine of Legislative EquivalencyMatter of Lamb v Town of Esopus, 35 AD3d 1004, 827 N.Y.S.2d 307 The Lamb case raised two issues addressed by the Appellate Division. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:18 am
In a sort of reversal of the usual LULU (locally undersirable land uses) issue, in Centro Familiar Cristiano Buenas Nuevas v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:33 pm
Smith, 292 S.W.3d 14, 20 (Tex. 2009)); Townes Telecomms. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:50 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:06 am
Every state conducts itself in an entirely different manner, and within states the law is changed to suit the circumstances. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:25 am
In Huie v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:14 pm
This change of heart emerged shortly after the Supreme Court’s ruling in First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:58 am
Association v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
Supreme Court in Robins Dry Dock Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:58 am
Walter Cronkite clip on Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
RWE Npower Renewables Ltd v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:33 pm
Clover Valley Foundation v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:25 am
A. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:29 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
In May 2008, the Council obtained a without notice injunction under section 187B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for plot 19 in the above terms. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
In May 2008, the Council obtained a without notice injunction under section 187B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for plot 19 in the above terms. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:22 am
") AC30368 - Kopylec v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
The Court of Appeals also noted that the United States Supreme Court stated a “basic teaching of representative government … that elected officials represent all of those who elect them, and not merely those who are their neighbors," citing Dusch (387 US 112, Dallas County, Alabama v Reese (421 US 477) and Fortson v Dorsey, 379 US 433. [read post]