Search for: "WASHINGTON V. STATE"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 17,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
As reported by the Washington Blade, yesterday the virulently anti-gay Kansas-based Westboro Baptist Church filed a motion (full text) to intervene as a defendant in Marie v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
And other states can follow-suit: California, Illinois, Washington, and so on. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:44 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
It’s a blustery day in Washington as the court prepares for opinions. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:30 am
His ethics case, Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Editor in Chief Parker Howell wrote the third article, “Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating ‘Gray Markets’ After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
In the case of the Hatice Cengiz v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:11 pm
Florida, which concerns the constitutionality of life without parole for juvenile criminals; United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:46 am
It represents instead a sorry reflection of the pettiness of current political debate in Washington. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
The same problem faced the court recently in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 12:38 pm
Here's a neat little trademark case from earlier today.Michael Hallett lives in Washington state, buys a ton of products from Trader Joe's stores, drives 'em across the border to Canada, and then sells them (at a huge markup) in his own store -- called "Pirate Joe's" -- that has a nearly identical logo to Trader Joe's. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:00 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 4:30 am
For example, Washington State adopted a state constitutional ERA in 1972. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Case number: 10-cv-00955 (United States District Court for the Western District of Washington)Case filed: June 10, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: October 30, 2012 4/15/2013 7/15/2013 2013-26 SEC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:47 am
Tags: campaign regulation, First Amendment, Supreme Court Related posts State of the Union: Lip-reading Justice Alito (21) November 18 roundup (3) Yet more Edwards campaign-cash laundering (0) Yes, I’m being facetious (16) Wyeth v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:35 am
Briefly: In an op-ed in the Washington Examiner, Bradley Smith urges the court to grant review in a campaign finance case challenging restrictions on contributions to state and local political parties, arguing that it “makes no sense to send state and local parties to the back of the bus when it comes to political campaigns. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm
Price, 361 U.S. 304, 31 3 (1960 ) United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:54 am
In Williams v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:25 pm
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
