Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 4361 - 4380 of 14,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Ronald M. Levin
Supreme Court’s recent travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Likewise, pouring paint on statues of Ataturk has been considered as an expressive act performed as a protest against the Turkish political regime at the time (see Murat Vural v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Bob Ambrogi
” But there are also references to bearing arms “for the defense of themselves and the common state. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such written agreement must state that it will be the responsibility of the adoptive parent(s) to inform the appropriate State or local official when they are no longer legally responsible for the child or no longer providing any support to the child” (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][5]). [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:29 am
After some research in the matter, we believe a tie is not a loss, and Memon, survives another week.See, Bushel’s Case (1670) 124 E.R.1006; Bushel's case;  and Entick v Carrington [1765] 19 Howell's State Trials 1030. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:37 pm by Randy Barnett
Or did the prefatory clause merely state a purpose for which the right was ratified, and, therefore, you read the right as written: the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
And in 1990 David Souter refused to state his position on Roe v. [read post]
Jeff’s practice includes assisting clients with all aspects of drug and alcohol testing programs, including creation, implementation and enforcement. [1] See Miners v. [read post]
Jeff’s practice includes assisting clients with all aspects of drug and alcohol testing programs, including creation, implementation and enforcement. [1] See Miners v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
  The state has a list of all registered voters. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:37 am by Randy Barnett
Or did the prefatory clause merely state a purpose for which the right was ratified, and, therefore, you read the right as written: the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. [read post]