Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 9,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
The Supreme Court upheld the legislation in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:35 am
The Appeals Court of Massachusetts released a recent opinion in a real estate case, Goddard v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Cases that might be particularly well-suited to a historian's perspective include United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
Curtis v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Appellate Division holds Civil Service Law Article 14 trumps Second Class Cities Law Article 9 with respect to negotiating police disciplinary proceduresCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
Inexplicably, this physician was unable to state whether she had spoken to Melissa's mother before or after the vaginal examination was performed. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 10:24 am
In Immobiliere Jeuness Establissement v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:19 pm
Court documents state that MCC violated the provisions of the SBA 8(a) program. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am
Lewis v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
” Gottlieb v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:02 am
In a relatively short and quite brutal judgment, the Court of Appeal found: While it was equally bound by MA & Ors and Burnip, it was also bound by the way MA & Ors had distinguished Burnip, as at 71-75 of MA. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 11:36 am
In Harrison v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Hunter’s Lessee) the Court clarified that “[t]he Idaho Supreme Court, like any other state or federal court, is bound by this Court’s interpretation of federal law. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
The Supreme Court recently handed down its judgment in the case of Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas Plc [2015] UKSC 71 (read our Case Preview here). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Valentino v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:35 pm
This post is part of RegBlog’s ten-part series, The Bounds of Executive Discretion in the Regulatory State. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
This post is part of RegBlog’s ten-part series, The Bounds of Executive Discretion in the Regulatory State. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 5:11 pm
It has been kept within bounds which were believed to be wise and just. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 12:42 pm
The police department and community college are bound by the First Amendment and state constitutional free speech principles when they engage in these activities. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
