Search for: "House v. State" Results 4361 - 4380 of 25,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2013, 4:01 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
FlynnThis post is straight from Texas, our most prolific death penalty state. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 32 states have death penalty sentencing statutes to the 18 that have banned such punishment, including, most recently, New York, and New Jersey in 2007, and Illinois in 2009.In the 1972 case of Furman v Georgia, the SCOTUS suspended capital punishment on the basis of the 8th Amendment bar against cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 9:07 am by Biersdorf & Associates
In 2005, when the Supreme Court revealed the decision in the now infamous eminent domain case, Kelo v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The only discussion of issue (2) was Russell making an analogy to someone living in a house and throwing rocks at other houses. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 7:53 am by Raven Moore
The Vermont House on Thursday passed a bill intended to protect the legality of abortion in the event the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:00 am
  See Lennie House v Commonwealth of Kentucky, No 2007-CA-000417-DG (Ky App 01/18/2008)       In this case, the defendant sought to discover the source code of the Intoxilyzer 5000 so it could be examined for "bugs" or flaws in the code's logic which could result in an incorrect blood alcohol reading. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The order of Judge James Robart in Washington v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:52 pm by Savanna Nolan
In an interview on Law.com, Chemerinsky stated he thinks this case has the “potential to be the Brown v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 8:37 am by Tom Smith
On a Sunday morning in May, Wisconsin Family Action, a pro-life group housed in a brick building in a suburb of the state capital of Madison, was fire-bombed. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]