Search for: "IN RE T A G"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 7,052
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
Ohio); Laura Taylor Swain (53, S.D.N.Y.); and Linda T. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:51 am
Bu verilere göre kazanc? [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:49 am
It's true that it's never a good idea to travel while distracted, whether you're walking, biking or driving. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
They’re going to cite Sharia law? [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 2:41 pm
nda bu önerge madde metnine eklenecek, önergeye göre ödeme ? [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:09 am
"We want to make sure that if, for some reason, someone doesn't recognize the situation, we aren't held accountable for someone else's actions,'' said Joshua Lemay, director of operations at Ultimate Parking. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
Aude Mac Eleavy Fiorini : Qu’y a-t-il en un nom ? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
Also, the embedded pre-payment option associated with mortgage-backed securities creates re-investment risk, which can significantly affect yield. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:28 am
e giren kanuna göre suç say? [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:40 pm
They're our daughters and granddaughters, neighbors, friends. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:36 pm
Kadner, T. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
OHA specifically noted: “[T]he Area Office erred in basing its finding of affiliation on assistance that was within the scope of the mentor-protégé program. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:09 am
Monthly Uniques Faster Than Any Standalone Site Ever -comScore" pjblack.me/Am82wh "Don't break stories on Twitter, BBC journalists told" pjblack.me/x9p1Jh this is cool: "Chrome 17 released, will preload autocompleted URLs as you type" pjblack.me/AF0m6N a good summary of the #optusnrl decision from @mdezwartpjblack.me/w2lAjh #lwb486 #lws008 #kkb175 "Man Convicted For Tweeting A Joke Takes His Case To The High… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm
Because now, instead of The Susan G. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:01 am
Because now, instead of The Susan G. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The criteria developed in G 1/07[6] Before dealing with the criteria of G 1/07 in detail, it is necessary to deal with the proprietor appellants’ assertion that exclusions from patentability should be construed narrowly. [6.1] According to G 1/07 [3.1], a provision containing exclusions or exceptions from patentability is to be interpreted in such a manner that it takes its effect fully and achieves the purpose for which it was designed. [6.2] As further explained in… [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:03 pm
Que souhaite-t-on avoir, en fin de compte ? [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
James G. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:34 pm
The Applicant didn't mention the case, and it doesn't appear to be referenced in any other BPAI decision. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Such a reference, however, has no clear technical meaning and it is doubtful whether and how a material referred to in this way can be unambiguously distinguished from another material (see T 480/98 [5.3]).[5.3.1] Such a trade mark (Handelsmarke) is not suitable for unambiguously identifying a material, also because it can be modified at any time over the course of time. [read post]
