Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 4361 - 4380
of 7,669
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
I’m not being completely overdramatic here. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
I'm not sure how the Fraley v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:23 am
So yesterday officially marked the second half of my law school career here at CWSL. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
Tertiary infringement re-redux: Download.com sued again for secondary copyright infringement for distributing LimeWire and BitTorrent clients [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm
All of those things are true, but they badly miss the mark. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
" This is a good reminder that when we're called for potential expert gigs, we have to clarify exactly what we're being asked to opine upon and whether it's appropriate for expert testimony. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:51 am
But a lot of it misses the mark, in my opinion, because it’s not particularly action oriented. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
It's that too often, we're not even in the game. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
Or more likely I’m going to overcommit to other things – committees, blogs, websites, projects that nobody else approves of….I work on the basis that being misunderstood by contemporaries is the mark of true genius (this may be the mark of true foolishness). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 11:38 am
Maybe they’re even humorous most of the time. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm
I’m pleased to announce that Mark Edwards is back for a repeat visit during the month of January. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
I'm kidding. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:08 pm
I’m still doing mourning. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
"He*l, they're all disgruntled. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:37 am
I’m sure she was busy. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:14 am
TTAB Reverses 2(d) Refusal of MLOCKER Over "M" Designs for DifferentialsTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Did the Board Reverse? [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
So the fact that you just pointed out--you're right, I'm not going to go out and try to raise taxes on the bottom half of the income ladder. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:50 am
The dominant portion of applicant’s and registrant's marks is the letter M. [read post]
