Search for: "John Doe D" Results 4361 - 4380 of 9,816
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
It originally based its petition on Section 2(d), alleging prior use of a trade mark in US commerce (and likelihood of confusion). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:13 am by Eric Goldman
John Ottaviani: Blogs (including yours) have significantly changed the way attorneys learn about new developments. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:05 am by Eric Goldman
In 2008, if my memory serves me right, I got a huge victory in court against the English Premier League trying to disclose my clients’ details on a John Doe request. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:59 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
§ 903, que requiere, inter alia: (1) a State law prescribing a method of composition of indebtedness of such municipality may not bind any creditor that does not consent to such composition; and (2) a judgment entered under such a law may not bind a creditor that does not consent to such composition. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by John Jascob
To qualify for the Section 202(a)(11)(D) exclusion, the publication or website must meet three criteria. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am by Michael Lowe
The Government, however, believed that the Jane Does simply didn’t have “standing” to bring a federal lawsuit even though the CVRA (d)(5) specifically authorizes a crime victim to make an application to “re-open” a plea deal if the NPA was violated. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   [NB: Marty Schwimmer & John Welch represent Belmora.] [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:31 am by Inside Privacy
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), John Rockefeller (D-WV), Mark Pryor (D-AR), and Bill Nelson (D-FL) introduced a similar bill, the Data Security and Breach Notification Act (S. 177) this week the Senate. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:53 am
Does "Fox News Sunday" have yesterday's transcript up yet? [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
  Its genesis is John Ruggie's closing remarks delivered at the close of the 3rd Forum on Business and Human Rights held in Geneva 2-3 December 2014. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
 The Third District emphasized that the computer `belong[ed] to the [company],’ that the company had a policy against using its computers for personal reasons, and that the employee was `aware of and agree[d] to these condition,’ going on to ex [read post]