Search for: "People v J."
Results 4361 - 4380
of 7,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 2:19 am
J. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
(As it is an ongoing case, all apparent statements of fact are as set out in the judgment and should be taken as being untested at trial).Leicester Housing Association Ltd v Armstrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:06 am
© 2013 Alexander J. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
Charles J. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Like most people accessing the Internet this week, we at Lawfare were a bit focused on everything related to the Edward Snowden leaks. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:11 pm
Attorney J. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:55 am
Also, " To slide off heavily; to plump down; to fall or collapse clumsily or heavily..." 1884 J. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:15 am
Patterson and Aundrell Patterson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:33 am
Referring to the recent outbreak of authoritative case law on survey evidence in Interflora v Marks & Spencer (noted by the IPKat here), Birss J refused the application.This Kat prefersZZZ to Zee In the learned judge's view, it was obvious that the evidence sought to be adduced would not be all the evidence that Zee Entertainment would be relying on it its claim. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
I am not sure how many people actually have the long view over time, or the wider view internationally. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:05 am
J. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:18 am
Robert J. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
Also, Orphan Drug exclusivity only applies to rare diseases (affecting less than 200,000 people in the US and fewer than 5 people per 10,000 in the EU) [and is] shorter than average patent protection (12 years). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Med. 771 (1988); Joshua Muscat & Michael Huncharek, “Causation and disease: Biomedical science in toxic tort litigation,” 31 J. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Irving J. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:13 am
— over the years as people used the word as a humorous euphemism, causing it to sound — at least to me — like a insult. [read post]
