Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 4,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
The Scope of Liability In the Illinois Supreme Court case, Karas v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
If judges do not have the interest or the time to render the required service, they should say so. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Since 2015, Minneapolis police officers have used neck restraints at least 237 times, and rendered people unconscious 44 times, according to NBC News. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 9:55 am
Venkat's recent post on Facebook v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 5:51 am
In an amicus brief filed on Apr. 8, 2025 in Perkins Coie LLP v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
Nicopure Labs, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
Only 30 people worked in the ICE FOIA Office, which now boasts 60 personnel. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:14 am
Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
In addition to talking about personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction, we should discuss scope of jurisdiction, as in the question of what is the appropriate geographical scope of orders rendered by a court that has personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction? [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
And in Houston v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:01 pm
Baron’s essay challenges Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Using pre-2007 archival data of the population of then- known arbitration awards, this Article quantitatively assesses whether ICSID arbitration awards were substantially different from arbitration awards rendered in other forums. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
The government's explanation for this exemption is, in effect, that because such employers typically can and do prefer to hire employees who are coreligionists who can be assumed to share the churches' religious commitments, such employees are less likely to wish to purchase birth control: "[H]ouses of worship and their integrated auxiliaries that object to contraceptive coverage on religious grounds are more likely than other employers to employ people of the same faith… [read post]
