Search for: "State v. Davis" Results 4361 - 4380 of 5,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  Damages were assessed, following a default judgment, in the sum of £75,000 On  12 March 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Davies v Carter. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 July 2019 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Vos C and Davis LJ) heard the appeal against the judgment of Warby J in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicola Davies J concluded the hearing of the CMC in the case of Building Register v Weston. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am by Erin Miller
  The procedure in that case, Burnham v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am by Richard D. Friedman
He wondered why, if a state treated a matter as within a hearsay exception, the Confrontation Clause should require exclusion.There was some irony here, because Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Lilly v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:30 am by admin
Davis-Stirling states a 30-90 day window prior to the start of the fiscal year. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
The Vale of Glamorgan Council v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1532 (Admin) (16 June 2011): Council fails in challenge to closure if Barry Magistrates Court in Wales – wider victory for court closures plans. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:34 am by Orin S. Kerr
Here's a possibility: The Utah Supreme Court's ruling today in State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 6:19 am
Applying the standards from Davis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]