Search for: "State v. N. N." Results 4361 - 4380 of 21,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Joseph Scopelitis
Yet it was just a few months ago that disgraced former film producer and Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein was found guilty of two of the five charges he faced in New York state court. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:11 am by John Bellinger, Sean Mirski
The court in Gonzalez was interpreting a provision in Title III stating that “[i]n the case of property confiscated before March 12, 1996, a United States national may not bring an action under [the Act] ... unless such national acquires ownership of the claim before March 12, 1996. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm by Margo Schlanger
But all we got this morning was a unanimous decision in Lomax v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Jason Mazzone
Read with modern spectacles Jacobson looks extraordinarily deferential to the state. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Hunton Andrews Kurt Privacy & Information Security Law Blog had a post “EDPB Releases Statement on Restrictions on Data Subject Rights in Connection with the State of Emergency in Member States”. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 5:25 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Section 86.091, Florida Statutes states “[n]o declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceedings. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]