Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 4361 - 4380
of 6,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
§ 547(b); (2) whether criminal restitution, which is ordered to further the state's goals of deterrence and rehabilitation, is “to or for the benefit of a creditor” under 11 U.S.C. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:09 am
EASWARAN P. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:26 pm
Corp.,786 P.2d 1326, 1330-31 (Utah 1990). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:05 am
v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
Jou v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:22 am
P. 9(b), fraud needed to be pleaded with particularity and that it is not clear who made the misrepresentations to who and when these events occurred. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Equally, the European Court of Human Rights considers that the principles set out in the preamble to the Convention refers to the Convention as a whole (see, inter alia , ECHR rulings Engel and Others v. the Netherlands on June 8, 1976, Klass and Others v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:09 pm
PC Drivers Headquarters, LP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 8:16 am
The decision by Judge Bledsoe last week in 130 of Chatham, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 6:20 am
Case Name: Crackenberger v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:02 pm
Relying on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision in Sierra Club v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 6:50 am
Our hypothetical executive may wish to collect their income 5 years in the future when they are retired and only have to pay a 24% federal income tax and no state income tax in a zero-income tax state like Florida. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
The judges added that Rule 37 of Regulation 2868/95, which establishes that 'the applicant must provide particulars showing that he is allowed under the applicable national law to lay claim to that right', comprising details on the content of that law (Case C-263/09 P, Edwin v OHIM), is applicable to Article 53(1)(c) CTMR [Do: tell the OHIM which national law your right is based upon, what its content and interpretation is, how your sign qualifies for the protection offered by it;… [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 3:54 pm
Walter v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
(b) Safe Harbors, Impersonation and Infringement. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:43 am
-Marilyn B. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
Rufe is a judge on the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
That's the part of the Bankruptcy Code that makes your phone stop ringing and lawsuits stop coming when you file a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Arizona.It's a pretty complicated piece of legislation, and it's fundamentally different from the versions of stays which existed under the Bankruptcy Act (the version of the bankruptcy law that we had in the United States prior to what bankruptcy lawyers called the New Code prior to the 2005 Amendments. [read post]
