Search for: "A&J Manufacturing, Inc." Results 421 - 440 of 1,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11, 20 (1st Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 133 S. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am by Miquel Montañá
In that case, Lord Hoffmann quoted Jackson J in Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co Inc v Linde Air products Co 339 US 605, 607 (1950) to illustrate that “the United States courts had «allow[ed] the patentee to extend his monopoly beyond his claims», so as to prevent «the unscrupulous copyist [from making] unimportant and insubstantial changes and substitutions in the patent which, though adding nothing, would be enough to take the copied matter… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am by Miquel Montañá
In that case, Lord Hoffmann quoted Jackson J in Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co Inc v Linde Air products Co 339 US 605, 607 (1950) to illustrate that “the United States courts had «allow[ed] the patentee to extend his monopoly beyond his claims», so as to prevent «the unscrupulous copyist [from making] unimportant and insubstantial changes and substitutions in the patent which, though adding nothing, would be enough to take the copied matter… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
Background and context The story starts fairly conventionally when Equustek, a manufacturer of electronic networking products, fell out with its distributor Datalink Technologies Gateways Inc (‘Datalink’), which then operated from Vancouver. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:43 am by Stephen Pitel
In Google Inc. v Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34 (available here) Equustek sued Datalink for various intellectual property violations relating to the manufacture and sale of a networking device. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision [Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34] in the important and longstanding litigation between Equustek Solutions and Google, concerning an issue that has become particularly sensitive over time: can Google be ordered to de-index results from its search engine globally, ie in respect of all country versions of its search engine? [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision [Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34] in the important and longstanding litigation between Equustek Solutions and Google, concerning an issue that has become particularly sensitive over time: can Google be ordered to de-index results from its search engine globally, ie in respect of all country versions of its search engine? [read post]