Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 421 - 440
of 11,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2009, 12:59 pm
The application can be read here; a supplemental appendix on a related development is here. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 9:01 am
In contrast, the Examiner findings address each claim limitation raised on appeal by Appellants and also these findings reference specific teachings in Lee as showing these claim limitations.Weighing as a whole the Appellants' arguments, which are not supported by further explanation, that the elements are missing and the Examiner's specific and detailed findings, we reach a conclusion that Appellants have not shown error in the Examiner's finding… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:59 pm
You can read the entire decision, here: Baker v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
The government moved to dismiss, arguing that the appeal was barred by the appeal waiver executed as part of the plea bargain. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:16 am
Ex parte Harvey, (BPAI Jul. 15, 2009)In this appeal, the Applicants appealed the Examiner's final rejections of twenty-two claims as being either anticipated or obvious in light of the prior art. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:06 pm
Read the full article. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:05 am
The Examiner read "a portion of" on the entire amount of adhesive in the strip. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:06 pm
If the board finds that that the appeal is inadmissible, examination and decision as to its allowability are not possible. [read post]
12 May 2012, 8:32 pm
A representative claim on appeal read: 1. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:42 pm
€ 160 The post Lithuania: Refusal of a patent application and its consequences, Court of Appeal of Lithuania, 2A-162-798/2016, 4 March 2016 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:49 am
From within Ex parte VINAROV , wherein the Board sustained the Examiner. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:53 pm
In an expansive recent ruling, the California Court of Appeal in Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:58 am
The applicant does not provide one either; neither during first instance examination nor during the appeal. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
The applicant filed an appeal after the Examining Division (ED) had refused his patent application.Here are some relevant details relating to the examination proceedings.There were oral proceedings (OPs) on November 15, 2007. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
The Court of Appeals rejected defendant’s argument that admitting the detective’s statement was plain error, noting that defense counsel elicited similar testimony on cross-examination. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:45 am
One thing we can say for sure: an infelicitous question on direct examination gives Beckwith one more chance at beating the rap that he killed Eric Copley four years ago. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
Beginning with (1) the findings of fact to support the trial court’s conclusion of law that the traffic stop was not unconstitutionally extended, the Court of Appeals explained that “our de novo review examining the constitutionality of the traffic stop’s extension shows that the challenged legal conclusion is adequately supported by the findings of fact. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:29 am
Or possibly though Official Notice, if appropriate.Not all Examiners take these findings seriously, which leads to appeals like this one. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:50 am
On appeal, Fote argued otherwise — especially considering the PTO’s new (limited) approach to eligibility examination. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:29 am
Read the full guidelines here. [read post]
