Search for: "APPLICATION OF GRAHAM" Results 421 - 440 of 1,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2016, 2:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Invited to file an application by the US Patent Office, Gray declined and left priority to Bell. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
However, the rod shape patented by Graham does notbecome patentable again by virtue of Cooke’s stated preference for spheresover other shapes. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:04 am
  Sudden Emergency Doctrine Still Valid in PAIn the case of Graham v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 1:55 am
 This event is free for AIPPI UK members and new applicants for membership. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:08 am by Cynthia Larose
   But, regulators have made it quite clear that the general privacy laws and regulations apply whether the application is online or mobile. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:15 am
 Subsection (d) the applicant has no reason to believe that the individual is alive and (e) there is sufficient evidence to find that the individual is dead.Sean Graham: But for the first factor in each of those two subsections, the remaining ones are all the same. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 8:14 am
  Finally, the court limited the injunction to only the specific products that were the subject of the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) that led to the lawsuit, but affirmed the inclusion of both defendants as parties to the injunction, even though one would only be liable for inducing infringement.More detail of Forest Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 5:57 am
IPBiz has wondered how Selfridge, an employee of the US Army, was named a co-inventor of a patent for a private group (which included Alexander Graham Bell and Glenn Curtiss). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:56 am by Jeff Vail
-Notice & Disclaimer: Jeff Vail is a trial attorney at the Denver law firm of Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:34 am by Tim Zinnecker
Graham, Associate Dean of Academic Affairs, University of South Dakota School of Law, 414 East Clark Street, Vermillion, SD 57069. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 4:00 pm
Graham, 40 A.D.3d 118 (2007), rev’d 9 N.Y.3d 393 (2007), the Court found that “[t]his was in clear violation of the law in effect at the time of trial…and plaintiff’s counsel did not discover it until that time. [read post]