Search for: "AS PTO, LLC" Results 421 - 440 of 1,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2015, 5:36 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") has instituted IPRs for 2 of the 11 patents-in-suit, involving 3 of the 22 claims asserted against EMC. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:14 am by Wes Anderson
In essence, Young beat Johnny Football to the PTO register for JOHNNY FOOTBALL. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 2:45 am
The Board observed that the PTO "makes a distinction between the performances embodied in a compact disc, and the compact disc itself. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Princeton Vanguard,LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
If Congress wants to elucidate or maintain the Supreme Court’s reintroduction of discretion, it should not wait for litigation. = = = = = [1] Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
Exela Pharama Sciences, LLC, at *2.HoldingWe affirm the dismissal, on the ground that PTO revival rulings are not subject to third party collateral challenge, thereby precluding review regardless of whether Exela’s claims were time-barred.Id. at *3. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:30 am by Wes Anderson
Son registered the entity “40-0 LLC” on October 25, 2013, having registered the 40and0.com domain name three days earlier. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The challengers are Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC; Exela Pharmsci, Inc.; and Exela Holdings, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 3:56 am
In short, the PTO failed to meet its burden to show that Millbrook is the name of a place generally known to the public, and not remote or obscure. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons' Den: where… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 11:06 am by Ron Coleman
 It just happens that the procedural history of the application for THE SLANTS in the PTO gave rise to even more troubling issues, and we never got the opportunity to undo In re Heeb Media, LLC, 89 U.S.P.Q.2d 1071 (T.T.A.B. 2008). [read post]