Search for: "Advanced Discovery Inc."
Results 421 - 440
of 1,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
This makes it well-neigh impossible to apply the valid-when-made concept to any particular component of the revolving balance except when a single transaction, such as a promotional cash advance made by means of a check, is tracked separately in the accounting system (and periodic billing statements), i.e. as a distinct balance type to which a special interest rate is applied. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
This makes it well-neigh impossible to apply the valid-when-made concept to any particular component of the revolving balance except when a single transaction, such as a promotional cash advance made by means of a check, is tracked separately in the accounting system (and periodic billing statements), i.e. as a distinct balance type to which a special interest rate is applied. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Time agreed to pay $25,000, $12,500 in advance and an additional $12,500 at publication, in exchange for the right to excerpt 7,500 words from Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 10:13 am
(“Conduent”) and Protech Solutions, Inc. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:14 am
Comparative Biosciences, Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm
Drawing heavily on the case of Sony Music Entm’t, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:21 am
Cambridge Pavers, Inc., 2017 WL 4948064, No. 17-1538 (D.N.J. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 10:36 am
Honeywell, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:30 am
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
All discovery in the case has been stayed pending a decision in Jesner, with Judge Lamberth stating an expected trial date of “late 2018 or early 2019. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See EduCap, Inc. v Sanchez, No. 01-12-01033-CV (Tex.App. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Edwards, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:56 am
In any event, to the extent any prejudice against defendants exists, it is negligible and can be cured by further discovery (Jacobson, 68 AD3d at 654 [“(T)he need for additional discovery does not constitute prejudice sufficient to justify denial of an amendment”]). [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 2:45 pm
These include (1) parent or controlling company liability (pp. 5-10); (2) forum non conveniens (as a method of avoiding jurisdiction by national courts home to apex multinational enterprises) (pp. 11-13); (3) disclosure regimes and transparency initiatives (pp. 14-18); and (4) access to information an discovery rules (pp. 19-20). [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 2:48 pm
Finally, examining the non-party employees’ constitutional privacy interests, the court explained that the relevant test for evaluating Marshalls’ privacy objection was the Hill test initially applied to the wage-and-hour class action context in Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm
Actavis, Inc. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm
Actavis, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
Hydrotech Sys., Inc., 109 F.3d 1567, 1572 (Fed. [read post]
