Search for: "Art Technology Group, Inc." Results 421 - 440 of 773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
The patent relates to markup languages technology, and i4i alleged that Microsoft Word's XML editor infringed the patent. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
The patent relates to markup languages technology, and i4i alleged that Microsoft Word's XML editor infringed the patent. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:49 am by sally
Supreme Court Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Ltd & Ors (Ver 2) [2011] UKSC 17 (6 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jenson & Anor v Faux [2011] EWCA Civ 423 (13 April 2011) Garratt v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 425 (13 April 2011) Secretary of State for the Foreign Office & Commonwealth Affairs v Maftah & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 350 (13 April 2011) Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences v The Albert Court Residents’… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
DirecTV Group, Inc., 523 F.3d 1323, 1334-35 (Fed. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am by Marie Louise
(Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Massachusetts – A good tacking decision: Boathouse Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
CQG, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Copyright The problem with the fifth fair use factor (Plagiarism Today) US Copyright – Decisions New York Court of Appeals to Second Circuit: Copyright owners suffered injury in New York for long arm jurisdiction: Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
DirecTV Group, Inc., 523 F.3d 1323, 1334-35 (Fed. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 11:33 am by admin
As previously reported, Interval Licensing has sued nine technology companies (Apple Inc., Google Inc. and its YouTube subsidiary, Facebook Inc., Yahoo Inc., AOL Inc., eBay Inc., Netflix Inc., OfficeMax Inc. and Staples Inc.) for patent infringment. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2007) (limiting the potential for treble damages to cases where the adjudged infringer’s actions were at least “objectively reckless”) (see Chart 1);  ·       Expand the false marking doctrine, Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:30 pm by Vincent LoTempio
Her research began at Greatbatch Inc. and continues today at the University at Buffalo. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:59 am by The Docket Navigator
Trading Technologies International, Inc., et. al., 1-05-cv-04088 (ILND February 23, 2011, Order) (Coleman, J.). [read post]