Search for: "Attorney General v. Department of Public Utilities" Results 421 - 440 of 624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
Clair’s Sheriff Department and started work at Oakland County Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:29 am by royblack
For example, the Department of Justice prosecuted Lauren Stevens a former associate general counsel of GlaxoSmithKline for obstruction of justice. [read post]
The Court points to Water Code Section 103, and states that the legislature did not intend for municipalities to be allowed to withdraw water for general public use in an aquifer. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Click Here Anchorage Waste Water Utility and Contractor Pay $9850 EPA Storm Water Penalty. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:08 am by Matthew Nelson
  Others pointed out that if the current Rules were better utilized, specifically the meet-and-confer provisions of Rule 26(f), then many preservation challenges could be minimized. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:11 pm by Craig Toncic
Since the first lawsuit alleging website ADA violations was filed in 2006 in National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:06 pm by Jeremy Graboyes
The seminal 1941 report of the Attorney General’s Committee on Administrative Procedure included a study of the “Utilization of Material Not Offered as Evidence. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Investigators concluded that when questioned about his talks with Interior attorneys and others outside the department, Zinke and his then-chief of staff failed to comply with their “duty of candor” as public officials to tell the truth, the report said. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 12:24 am by Peter Mahler
The Appellate Division, Second Department’s opinion last week in PFT Technology, LLC v Wieser, 2020 NY Slip Op 01942 [2d Dept Mar. 18, 2020], is one of those. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
(See Bureau of Labor Statistics for its publications at http://www.bls.gov) First Department Holds That Double Dipping Is Not Allowed Under Temporary Maintenance Guidelines In Khaira v Khaira, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 371997 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) the Appellate Division, in an opinion by Justice Saxe, considered the guidelines for awards of temporary spousal maintenance under Domestic Relations Law 236 (B)(5-a),… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am by Arthur F. Coon
While Public Resources Code § 21061 – a general definitional statute not cited by OPR in support of its proposal – defines an EIR as “a detailed statement setting forth the matters specified in Sections 21100 and 21100.1[,]” this general reference is of unclear import and per CEQA’s own terms governs “[u]nless the context otherwise requires. [read post]