Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 421 - 440 of 4,453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  Such orders were made in the cases of ASG v GSA, DFT v TFD, AMM v HXW and KJH v HGF. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
This flash gave some bare bones details and led to much debate on the internal NL email discussion list. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On Monday, January 25, 2010, the Court of Appeal (Third Appellate District) in Sacramento held further oral argument in McAdams v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
On 20 April 2021, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Corbyn v Millet [2020] EWHC 1848. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:10 am
 Plaintiff barely survives the motion -- with the trial court noting that plaintiff's argument against the application of the usual rule (based largely on the knives, uniforms, etc.) seemed "stretched and tortured" -- but survives it he does. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Restoring the original meaning of Reynolds and its progeny will help us reframe our understanding of the history of U.S. free exercise jurisprudence up until Smith, and it will provide a roadmap for the current Court as its Justices consider ways that they can overcome the deep divisions laid bare recently in Fulton v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:16 pm
A district court judge who, at a bare minimum, definitely recalled this particular defendant and (maybe) what he had promised the last time around.So, this time, when sentencing the guy, one of the things the district court judge was miffed about was the prior (alleged) broken promise. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:07 pm by Michel-Adrien
In SPV Osus Ltd v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) Ltd, the Supreme Court held that maintenance and champerty also prohibit the assignment of a “bare” cause of action, that is, the transfer of the right to litigate a claim to a party who has no direct interest in that claim. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Respondent's contention that Petitioner submitted "false responses to discovery demands", citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, the court opined that "there was at least 'a barely colorable justification' for the arbitrator's conclusion that there was a lack of competent evidence to support [Respondent's] claim of false discovery disclosures". [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Respondent's contention that Petitioner submitted "false responses to discovery demands", citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, the court opined that "there was at least 'a barely colorable justification' for the arbitrator's conclusion that there was a lack of competent evidence to support [Respondent's] claim of false discovery disclosures". [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Pfander and Nassim Nazemi, Northwestern University School of Law, have posted Morris v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
”And that sealed that deal.# # #DECISIONShalimar Leasing, LP v M. [read post]