Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 421 - 440
of 4,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 8:43 pm
In a unanimous and somewhat impatient opinion by Judge James Edmondson, the Court concluded that the plaintiffs had made only “bare assertions” and “legal conclusions” about the conduct of Bolivia’s leaders, rather than the specific factual allegations required by the Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:04 pm
Dodd-Frank’s creation of an entirely new liquidation regime with a far more “bare bones” statute than the Bankruptcy Code and a much less transparent process has created huge uncertainty in the markets, in the view of the hedge fund industry. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:06 am
Circuit handed down its decision in Allaithi v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
But the opinion may be more important than its bare holding, to the extent that it portends a possible future overruling of Abood v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:51 pm
In a Los Angeles case, Ingenuity 13 LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:35 am
Recently, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Weaver v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:56 pm
Doctor John's, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:41 pm
The cupboard is getting bare as we approach the election. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
So please help spread the word to those who may be in an underwater home, barely treading water themselves. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:04 pm
Commonwealth of Virginia, 24 Va.App. 768 (1997) and California v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
Georgia in 1792 (a case concerning federalism vs. states’ rights) and ending with the landmark Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
In two separate court filings yesterday, the attorneys for Bishop Mark Lawrence, the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina and twenty-nine parishes -- who had been told they must hand over their properties to the national Church (ECUSA) and its ersatz "diocese" (ECSC) -- laid bare the severe faults and conflicts of interest that permeate the bitterly divided 3-2 decision on August 2 by the South Carolina Supreme Court.The first filing is a 37-page petition for rehearing that… [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:48 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Co. of the Sw. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:25 am
Golden v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 11:30 am
Clontech and Durel v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:39 am
UTStarcom, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
John Elwood (barely) reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:58 pm
What a marvelous dissent by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, joined by judges Pregerson, Reinhardt, Thomas, and Watford, in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am
John Elwood (barely) reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
