Search for: "Clear Imaging, LLC" Results 421 - 440 of 845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2017, 4:42 am by SHG
Rather than rely on a description, the image speaks for itself. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:02 am by Duets Guest Blogger
’ Compare that image and text with the following, taken from the website of another certified B Corporation, Method:   In the copy below this image on Method’s website, Method states that “being a b corporation allows method to build [a socially conscious] ethos into the legal backbone of the company so that those values will never be compromised. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 4:52 am by Andres
Kappa Map Group, LLC to the growing corpus of decisions. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 4:41 am by SHG
© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:36 am by SHG
The programs work by assigning “hash numbers” to image and video files. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
” Let me clear up the confusion: The opinion in this case does not require preservation of all unallocated space in every case. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am by Ray Dowd
In other words, the term “audiovisual works” refers broadly to any work that includes any series of related visual images, whether or not moving, and with or without sounds, as long as a machine or device is essential to the viewing of therelated series of images. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:31 am by SHG
 © 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:28 pm by Ron Coleman
Four Seasons Greetings, LLC, 403 F.3d 958, 968 (8th Cir. 2005); see also MercExchange, 500 F. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:16 pm by Ron Coleman
[N]ow having heard the evidence and seen the evidence and seen the website presentations, it is clear to me that the portraying of Designer Skin’s product images on the website next to the S & L logo cannot cause any confusion that somehow S & L is associated with Designer Skin or is a so-called authorized distributor. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:58 am by Fernando A. Bohorquez, Jr.
The court found that because Vimeo employees posted comments or even “liked” some of the allegedly infringing videos, it was far from clear whether Vimeo knew about the copyright infringement and could therefore fall outside the DMCA's safe harbor protection. [read post]