Search for: "Cross v. Davis" Results 421 - 440 of 789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2013, 4:57 am
The court also noted that "due process does not require a hearing . . . until the employee has raised a genuine dispute on [the] operative facts", citing Davis v Westchester County, 42 AD3 79 (appeal dismissed 9 NY3d 953) . [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
” Gary Davis, Deputy District Manager at the Dallas District Office called ABC’s reporting “sensational journalism at its best. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:30 am by Schachtman
The Supreme Court’s celebrated 1993 decision in Daubert v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panelists: Bill Hearn, Davis LLP Canadian SCt decided Richard v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Tim Davie, acting director general, said that redactions were “driven by external legal advice. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 6:37 am by Jamison Koehler
  With Justice Scalia again writing on behalf of the majority in in Davis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:07 pm by Luke Rioux
"An even more telling UC Davis Study tested 18 dogs and their handlers. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]