Search for: "DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DIVISION" Results 421 - 440 of 2,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Should the appointing authority elect to terminate a probationary employee before he or she has completed the required minimum period of probation, the individual is entitled to administrative due process, i.e., "notice and hearing," otherwise to be accorded a "tenured employee. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A New York City police officer [Officer] was charged and found guilty of multiple New York City Police Department patrol guide violations that occurred in five separate incidents in course of a disciplinary hearing conducted by an assistant deputy commissioner [ADC]. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
It may also become an issue should a video tape of an incident is introduced in the course of an administrative disciplinary hearing. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Should the appointing authority elect to terminate a probationary employee before he or she has completed the required minimum period of probation, the individual is entitled to administrative due process, i.e., "notice and hearing," otherwise to be accorded a "tenured employee. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A New York City police officer [Officer] was charged and found guilty of multiple New York City Police Department patrol guide violations that occurred in five separate incidents in course of a disciplinary hearing conducted by an assistant deputy commissioner [ADC]. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:16 am
An arbitration hearing was held pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement and Education Law §3020(3), following which the arbitrator found Blake guilty of misconduct and recommended that petitioner's employment be terminated.After the Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education implemented the penalty recommended, Blake attempted to appeal the Chancellor's decision to State’s Commissioner of Education by serving copies of the appeal papers on a… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:17 am by gstasiewicz
“The Black Panther decision is a scandal for the Obama administration and it merits serious attention by investigators. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Although ERS again denied Sears' request for Tier 2 membership, Sears challenged the decision via an administrative hearing and the Hearing Officer recommended Sears' application for retroactive Tier 2 membership be granted. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Although ERS again denied Sears' request for Tier 2 membership, Sears challenged the decision via an administrative hearing and the Hearing Officer recommended Sears' application for retroactive Tier 2 membership be granted. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
This standard requires an applicant for accidental disability retirement benefits to "demonstrate that [the] injuries were caused by a precipitating event that was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [the individual's] ordinary job duties" Petitioner in this Article 78 action, an administrative law judge [ALJ] for the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, sustained injuries when she was leaving a hearing room and was hit on her left… [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
This standard requires an applicant for accidental disability retirement benefits to "demonstrate that [the] injuries were caused by a precipitating event that was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [the individual's] ordinary job duties" Petitioner in this Article 78 action, an administrative law judge [ALJ] for the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, sustained injuries when she was leaving a hearing room and was hit on her left… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:35 am
The Appellate Division dismissed Hughes petition noting that “appellate review of an administrative determination made after a hearing required by law is limited to whether that determination is supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:58 am
Ogden, has examined a variety of Justice Department policies over the last two months to allow for a quick start to the new administration. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
"Conceding that the reasons underlying the determination, are "facially legal," the petitioners argued that the two titles are not comparable because a Support Magistrate is directly empowered by statute to decide certain issues while a Court Attorney-Referee has no original jurisdiction conferred by statute and the Court Attorney-Referee must be appointed by a court to hear and report or, with the consent of the parties, hear and determine, the issues.The Appellate… [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" After a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge and, thereafter, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, affirmed the Labor Department's initial determination, finding that, as a per diem employee, Claimant's employment relationship with the school district ended on her last day of work, June 25, 2018. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" After a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge and, thereafter, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, affirmed the Labor Department's initial determination, finding that, as a per diem employee, Claimant's employment relationship with the school district ended on her last day of work, June 25, 2018. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:35 am
For example, in Stanton v Board of Trustees, 550 NYS2d 16, the Appellate Division ruled that Stanton was not deprived of administrative due process even though members of the Board who voted to terminate Stanton also participated in the underlying investigation that lead to charges of misconduct being brought against her. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Following a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge [ALJ] determined that the Sheriff’s Department had violated Civil Service Law §209-a (1)(d) by assigning the duties of security screening at the jail and at the correctional facility to non-MCDSA employees. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
(Decision & Order, Appellate Division, Second Department) [read post]