Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 through 10 inclusive"
Results 421 - 440
of 548
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm
A Kings Order of Protection Lawyer said that, defendant moves to dismiss counts 1 through 10 and 24 through 27 of the indictment on the ground that each count is duplicitous because each count charges multiple acts in violation of multiple court orders. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Sepulvado claims that the Louisiana courts trigger that rule, at least for capital defendants like him. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:40 am
On May 10, 2013, Res-Care made an offer of judgment to the individual Plaintiff in the amount of $25,000. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:55 pm
., No. 2011-1486 (Sept. 5, 2013).Issue(s)[1] "[Whether] system claim 1’s inclusion of an insurance claim folder, a task library database, a server component, and a task engine in attempting to show that the system claim is meaningfully different from the ’284 patent’s method claims [is enough to avoid having the claims ‘rise and fall together’ ?]" [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
”9 Thus, we can break theft of movable property under the Model Penal Code into three elements: (1) unlawful taking or control, (2) of movable property of another, and (3) with intent to deprive. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 1:53 pm
Given that a waiver analysis does not apply to delay preceding a dismissal, the court must determine whether the principles articulated require the inclusion of this delay. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:34 am
To pursue happiness as an inclusive goal through such activities as artistic creativity, intellectual work, sensuality, love, and aesthetic appreciation is to enjoy each of these activities as contributing something qualitatively unique to a life plan. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
According to a new decision, CEQA does not preclude all agency involvement or that of elected officials. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:43 pm
As the law firm memo’s authors state, this decision does represent an “incremental victory” for those who advocate for the inclusion of these types of provisions in corporate bylaws as a way to forestall costly and burdensome shareholder litigation. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:58 pm
The issue in this case is defendant was correct in concluding that the Domestic Relations Law does not permit same-sex couples to marry. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 12:42 pm
Can (and should) dispute resolution be made quicker or cheaper through systemic or institutional changes, or does improvement in time and cost depend inevitably on the efficiency of individual parties, counsel, and arbitrators? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
It is important to comb through the range of interests or goods that are protected by the modern criminal law through public lawyers and find ways to ensure that they act ethical at all times. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
It is important to comb through the range of interests or goods that are protected by the modern criminal law through public lawyers and find ways to ensure that they act ethical at all times. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:19 am
Patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without permission. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Domestic Relations Law § 240(1–b)(f)(10) and FCA § 413(1)(f)(10) state that, after performing the requisite calculations, “the court shall order the non-custodial parent to pay his or her pro rata share of the basic child support obligation. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:33 am
The defendant in question is listed only as John Doe and identified solely by his IP address. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Crown Equipment, 2:10-CV-0958, 2012 WL 3027989 (W.D. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
The Registry does not seem to recognize the theory and permits registration of colours only in combinations.Rupkatha argues that the inclusive definition of trademark under Section 2(1)(zb) of the TM Act, 1999 includes unconventional marks such as single colour. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
In the backlash against this judicial libertine approach, some courts, such as those in Texas, have embraced a principle that unfairly favors defendants. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
McGraw and State Farm Ins., GD 10-16523 (C.P. [read post]
