Search for: "Doe Physicians 1-40" Results 421 - 440 of 551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  The same is true of many other drugs, vaccines, and the like, many of which for this very reason cannot legally be sold except to physicians, or under the prescription of a physician. . . . [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:33 am by Robin E. Shea
There has been a lot of commentary about the new regulations, but here are some points that I have not seen anywhere else: 1. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:37 pm by Lara
  Paul’s team is focusing on 6 areas: 1. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:30 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
Vice President, As you know, the Environmental Protection Agency was a primary target of H.R. 1. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:36 am by Lauren Ellerman
However, I cannot recommend you file suit because while the physician / hospital / nursing home may have been negligent in their care, the costs of litigation will likely exceed your potential recovery.Well what does that mean people may wonder? [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:43 am
” The Court also concluded that “the cap, to the extent it includes nurse practitioners within its ambit, violates the equal protection guarantees of the Louisiana Constitution and La.R.S. 40:1299.41(A)(1), and, thus, is unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
The same rationale does not however, apply, in situations where the child, who, on attaining adulthood , moves the Court for a declaration to determine his/her parentage, as in this case. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:16 pm
No policymakers or commentators questioned why 40 percent of hospitals would sit out this opportunity to improve care. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A 53(c), second sentence, explicitly states that the exclusion provision does not apply to products for use in such methods. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm by emagraken
 Today the BC Court of Appeal released useful reasons for judgement confirming that hearsay evidence does not render an expert report inadmissible. [read post]