Search for: "Doe v. City of New York"
Results 421 - 440
of 5,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2009, 6:57 am
Moreover, this case is not controlling on other courts in New York City. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
A legal opinion by a municipal attorney is advisory Comptroller of the City of New York v Department of Fin. of the City of New YorkSupreme Court, New York County, 2014 NY Slip Op 24309, Supreme Court, New York CountyIn this special proceeding, the Comptroller of the City of New York [the Comptroller] asked Supreme Court to compel the City’s Department of Finance of the… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:01 am
Making false statements to a department investigator Foster v Kelly, 2008 NY Slip Op 07960, Decided on October 21, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentNew York City Police Department Commissioner Raymond Kelly dismissed New York City Police Officer Carlton Foster from his position after Foster was found guilty of making false and misleading statements to Department investigators and attempted to influence the testimony of a witness in an… [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:51 am
But New York State, and the City of New York, do it wrong. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:22 am
New York City Transit Authority, 2010 U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Guidelines used to determine if an entity is a “public body that is performing a governmental function” for the purposes of the Open Meetings LawThomas, et al. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 06989, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Department of Education [DOE] appealed an order and judgment handed down by Supreme Court, New York County, granting a petition filed… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:45 am
City of New York, NY Slip Op 07329 (2d Dept. 2010) Wednesday’s issue: Employment Law. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:51 am
City of New York, NY Slip Op 03033 (1st Dept. 2010) Tomorrow’s issue: Motion practice. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 1:12 am
New York City Transit Authority, NY Slip Op 01737 (1st Dept. 2010) Tomorrow’s issue: Motion practice. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:39 am
City of New York, NY Slip Op 09900 (2d Dept. 2010) Tomorrow’s issue: Employment Law. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:25 am
City of New York, NY Slip Op 01687 (1st Dept. 2011). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:16 am
City of New York, NY Slip Op 02426 (1st Dept. 2012).Here is the decision.Tomorrow’s issue: Summary judgment motions. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:48 am
New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
Hirst, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services [CAS] sued the New York City Civil Service Commission after the Commission certified Joshua Agrelo as eligible for appointment as a police officer with the New York City Police Department.Agrelo had been disqualified for appointment by CAS based on his arrest record. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:53 pm
Jurisdictional classification, position classification and determining the compensation to be paid individuals in the State’s “civil service” DeMartino v City of New York, 2012 NY Slip Op 22178, Supreme Court, New York County The City of New York promulgated Personnel Orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2 that approve and resulted in an amendment to Rule X of the Personnel Rules and Regulations of the… [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:53 am
On March 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of City of Cleveland v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, New York’s coercion claim looks solid.Jujitsu, Hypocrisy, and StandingThe apparent solidity of New York’s federalism claims does not ensure their success. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:42 pm
New York City Dep’t. of Educ., 71 F.4th 120, 126 (2d Cir. 2023). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Moreover, contrary to the plaintiff's further contention, the doctrine of estoppel is inapplicable (see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282; International Merchants v Village of Old Field, 203 AD2d at 248). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Moreover, contrary to the plaintiff's further contention, the doctrine of estoppel is inapplicable (see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282; International Merchants v Village of Old Field, 203 AD2d at 248). [read post]
