Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office" Results 421 - 440 of 1,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
For example, in a 2003 report, the United States General Accounting Office found that from 1991 to 2001, Florida’s physician supply per 100,000 people grew from 214 to 237 in metropolitan areas and from 98 to 117 in nonmetropolitan areas, or percentage increase [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 7:56 am
Leah Durant is the owner and principal attorney of the Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
Id. at 23. (4) Finally, the defendant argued that the trial court erred by allowing cross-examination of his father and contended the State elicited irrelevant testimony from his father. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
However, the Bonkalo Report (for the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney-General, dated Dec. 16, 2016, by Justice Annemarie E. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am by Bona Law PC
Brief of the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellee SmileDirectClub, LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
” The State of Texas filed a complaint in the United States Supreme Court, in an attempt to invoke that court’s original jurisdiction to adjudicate Texas’ complaint that it was harmed by voting procedures in four states in which Trump lost the popular vote. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
” The State of Texas filed a complaint in the United States Supreme Court, in an attempt to invoke that court’s original jurisdiction to adjudicate Texas’ complaint that it was harmed by voting procedures in four states in which Trump lost the popular vote. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
The appellate court agreed with the City Attorney and concluded: “The ABC test does not mandate the use of employees for any business or hiring entity. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am by Elie Maalouf
United States, 9 The United States Supreme Court also recognized that the discovery of communications is distinct from the discovery of the underlying facts of those communications. [read post]