Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 421 - 440
of 4,576
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 8:30 am
Lesson #1: Always Answer the Requests for Admission. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:18 pm
The original application, covering classes 9, 16, 25, 28, 35, 38, 41 and 43 was divided into two applications on 1 August 2019, around a week after the public backlash began. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 2:45 pm
Due to her severe injuries, Meili does not remember anything about the attack. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 6:13 pm
Each tower serves a geographical area ranging from a 10-25 km radius in the country and 1-2 km, radius (or even less) in the city [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
Carrion, 304 Conn. 925, 41 A.3d 1052 (2012). [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 7:43 pm
It does this by setting limitations on the types of processes and information that can be required by a trademark office. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
In his view (which you can read in full here):1. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
Does 1-41 (Austin, TX)SONY v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:44 am
It holds as follows 1. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Maharishi challenged the Board of Appeal’s decision with four pleas, respectively concerning Article 7(1)(a) and 75, 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(3) of the CTM Regulation. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:31 am
Yet he does not seem to be famous enough to get his name registered as an EU trade mark. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 12:31 pm
The Government typically does not negotiate these terms. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
But it does require the patentee to take the first step [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 7:21 am
Department of Energy (DOE), as a rule of thumb, you can assume that every 5 mph you drive over 60 mph will cost you 7 percent more for gasoline. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
The fact that we are all bored with the discussion does not however address the merits of the claim. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
Even if no sale or actual delivery of infringing goods actually occurred, the fact that the consumers were invited, by targeted advertising, to acquire ownership of the original or copy of the work in question, would suffice to trigger application of Article 4(1).What does this ruling mean? [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:07 pm
See id., col. 1, lines32–41. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:10 am
" [Article 1(2)]The question that arises - and has actually arisen - is who is responsible for paying such royalty.The Resal Right Directive - in my view and contrary to the reasons for harmonization within Recital 9 - fails to provide a uniform response, in that Article 1(4) therein does not really mandate a harmonized approach at the level of individual Member States. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:15 am
It does not preclude the granting of an injunction, non-compliance with which is punishable by a fine".In relation to questions 6,7 and 8 (seeking to clarify the possible exclusion of actions taken against intermediary service providers), the Advocate General sought to strike a balance per recital 41 of the Directive. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:38 am
As noted in the ICCS decision, UL does not agree to retroactive licenses. [read post]
