Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 421 - 440 of 3,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2015, 1:47 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
The 2016 IRS optional standard mileage rate for business miles driven is 54 cents per mile. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 7:04 am by David Oxenford
While September is one of those months with neither EEO reports nor Quarterly Issues Programs or Children’s Television Reports, that does not mean that there are no regulatory matters of importance to broadcasters. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 8:24 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Thus, even in the absence of any specific disclosure in document (10) of the measures necessarily implied therein in order to render identifiable the pouches containing different detergent products, it is apparent that any possible way of carrying out such teaching of the prior art would also necessarily result in pouches that are sensorially different as required by present claim 1.In addition, the Board concurs with the Opponent, that claim 1 of the Main Request does not… [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:13 am by Daniel Shaviro
How much of a difference does it make, to those of us in the bottom 99%, how equally or unequally spouses in the top, say, 1% or .1% or .01% "share" their income or wealth? [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
It follows that claim 1 of the sole request on file, the subject-matter of which is disclosed in entirety in D1, lacks the requirements of novelty of A 54 (1) and (2). [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:42 pm by Arielle Harris and Arthur F. Coon
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281, 289 (“Tomlinson”), the Court held that because exemption determinations do not provide a “public comment period,” that prong of Section 21177 does not apply here. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:10 pm
[50 FR 2290, Jan 16, 1985, as amended at 54 FR 30748, July 24, 1989; 62 FR 15424, Apr. 1, 1997] [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Brief for Petitioners 54–56; Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 31–32. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
By replacing the conventional objective approach by an approach based on the notion of “difficulty” and on the obviousness of the solution, without any relation to the prior art according to A 54(2), the ED has taken a decision that does not allow [the Board] to check whether the analysis of the facts and the conclusions drawn are correct. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
It contains an interesting discussion with respect to the use of an A 54(3) document.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 7:31 pm
The funny number is the 95-1 African American split but it is realistic to me. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:56 pm
How much does a patent cost? [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm by Michael W. Huseman
[This is Part 1 of a four part series concerning advanced collection techniques. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 9:56 am by Scott Gearity
(asked of Berge) A: 90% 1:50 Q: How does Canada treat Cuba and Iran? [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:53 am by Romano Beitsma
T 2333/11: What exactly does "divided into smaller objects" mean? [read post]