Search for: "Does 1-71" Results 421 - 440 of 2,535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Section 1041(c) provides that “For purposes of subsection (a)(2), a transfer of property is incident to the divorce if such transfer -- (1) occurs within 1 year after the date on which the marriage ceases, or (2) is related to the cessation of the marriage. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1]  (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
”  (p.71)  “[T]he Executive seeks to make unlawful presence lawful. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"However, said the court, the statute does not set out any administrative procedure for determining a firefighter's entitlement to benefits and a municipality may promulgate or negotiate such a procedure provided that it comports with administrative due process. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:30 am
Yet what has entirely escaped comment are some more interesting findings that can be gleaned only from crunching the numbers. 1. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 10:22 am by Derek T. Muller
One is to compare the way USNWR does the ranking (separating indebtedness from percent incurring debt) with one metric that combines them. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 10:22 am by Derek T. Muller
One is to compare the way USNWR does the ranking (separating indebtedness from percent incurring debt) with one metric that combines them. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:21 am by Broc Romanek
” It’s free for members of TheCorporateCounsel.net (but it does cost $20 in shipping & handling). [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The FDIC does not publish the names of the banks it has rated as problem institutions.) [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:06 pm
I am therefore not persuaded by the suggestion, at par. 71, that Primart had “no opportunity of being heard” on the issue of inherent distinctiveness. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Thus, for example, part I of subchapter A of chapter 1 of subtitle A starts with section 1. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If you have to show evidence of use, that really does have to be public to be “use. [read post]