Search for: "Dole v. Dole"
Results 421 - 440
of 698
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
Corp v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
Corp v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:54 am
The Wal-Mart case is all over the news these days but Stanford v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:06 pm
Now, in an unique moment of silence, of which it is sure to be interrupted, the AmeriKat has set out the tail of the Stanford v Roche patent assignment case, which was decided by the US Supreme Court on 6 June 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:05 pm
" Like with the UK, the general rule is that the rights in an invention belong to the inventor (Gayler v Wilder (1851));Solomons v US (1890)). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
(Patently-O) (IPKat) (IP Osgoode) Supreme Court clarifies ownership rights in federally funded inventions under the Bayh-Dole Act: Stanford v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
June 24th - Global-Tech v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
June 24th - Global-Tech v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:56 am
Highlights this week included: Supreme Court clarifies ownership rights in federally funded inventions under the Bayh-Dole Act: Stanford v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:37 am
Finally, we believe that in the interest of fairness a word about the person who has his name attached to this case - Dr. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court ruled in Board of Trustees of Stanford University v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:49 pm
In Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:21 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
University v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
University v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
In McNeill v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
Plata and Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
See, e.g., Mazer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:15 am
Of the question: Did the Supreme Court Rule in Stanford v. [read post]
