Search for: "EMPLOYEE DOE 5" Results 421 - 440 of 16,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2014, 10:23 am by Thomas Kaufman
  Unlike state law, federal law does not require an employee to be paid semimonthly. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:15 am by Kara M. Maciel
 Thus, if an employer requires an employee who typically works from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday through Friday to travel to a conference and such travel occurs on Wednesday from 3:00 pm to 7:00 pm, the employer is only required to pay the employee for a typical eight hour day ending at 5:00 pm. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Daylight Savings Time does not impact no-exempt employees who work, say, a 9 a.m. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:04 pm
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court has held that an employee bringing a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) must show that age was the "but for" cause of the challenged adverse action. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:17 pm
How will the outcome of these races (and perhaps Oregon and Alaska, too) influence the issues. 5. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
  Based on the medical certification, Edwards believed that she had until December 5 to return to work. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:01 am by Julia Riechert
However, if an employee does not have those benefits, then he or she shall be provided temporary disability benefits from the date of disability without a waiting period.[17] Employers Who Had Employee(s) Working Outside the Home and Who Contracted COVID-19 Between March 19–July 5, 2020 (Cal. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 12:50 pm by Alexandria Adkins
Although the look-back period is now six years, if an employee files a lawsuit today, that employee would only be able to recover for conduct dating back to August 6, 2019 (which is a limitations period of less than 5 years). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Unknown
Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC, 366 NLRB No. 177, slip op. at 5 (2018), enfd. in relevant part 803 Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:26 am by Nassiri Law
The company does, however, insure drivers and provides a host of standards and criteria workers are required to meet. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by James Davis, Editor, HR Daily Advisor
HR Daily Advisor: I can see how outplacement can help laid-off employees, but what value does it have for employers? [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:16 am by Kayla A. Haines, Esq.
Courts evaluate whether your interference was improper based on: (1) the nature of your conduct; (2) your motive for interfering; (3) your competitor’s interests in its contract with its employee; (4) interests that you are pursuing; (5) the balancing of the interests in protecting your freedom to employ the employee and the contractual interests of your competitor; (6) how directly you interfered; and (7) the relations between the parties. [read post]