Search for: "Ex Parte Waters" Results 421 - 440 of 946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2015, 10:05 am by Michael Froomkin
There are 80,000 condos on Brickell, where will their water come from? [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:25 pm by Michael Froomkin
He noted the effects of the proposed projects on roads, sewerage and water. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
 This is part one…* UPC Mock Trial - a Kat reports from Paris - Part deux… and this is part two -- pardon, deux.* Posh wash or Porsche? [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Kyle Krull
Unless you mind certain money and legal matters, however, you can find yourself in hot water. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
State Water Resources Control Board (March 30, 2015, B252688) ____ Cal.App.4th___. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
EPA: (1) whether a Clean Water Act jurisdictional determination is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act; and (2) whether a due process claim against an agency action is subject to the APA’s finality requirement. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court further found that the Board did not violate the appearance of fairness doctrine because Delack did not engage in ex parte communications with opponents or proponents with respect to the window installation. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:27 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court concluded by finding that Longhi had an ex parte communication when she met with an official from the Hazardville Water Company about the property in dispute, and the Commission failed to show that the ex parte communication was harmless. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:54 am by Shawn Garrison
By Dad “X” If you live a long distance from your kids, visitation becomes an incredible part of your life. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:42 am by Joy Waltemath
A part-time secretary in a county water conservation district suspected fraud by the agency in its implementation of a federally-funded storm relief program. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 9:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs asserted that even though Knight did not vote on their proposal, he provided testimony and opinions before his fellow board members, with whom he had ex parte communications seeking to influence them and that Knight stood to benefit personally by the decision in that he admitted having a pecuniary interest involving property values. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Teva's attempt to resolve this ambiguity hinges in part on the prosecution history. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
When it considered the very same phrase in R v Salford Health Authority; Ex p Janaway [1989] AC 537, the House of Lords decided that “treatment” meant “the process of treatment in hospital for the termination of pregnancy” and “participate” meant “actually taking part in that process”. [read post]