Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 8:24 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
United States Mineral Products Co., 898 A.2d 590, 600 (Pa. 2006), "there is no strict liability in Pennsylvania relative to non-intended uses even where foreseeable by the manufacturer. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am by Public Employment Law Press
Selected summaries of decisions alleging unlawful discrimination in violation of state and, or, federal civil rights laws posted by New York Public Personnel Law. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am by Public Employment Law Press
Selected summaries of decisions alleging unlawful discrimination in violation of state and, or, federal civil rights laws posted by New York Public Personnel Law. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
In 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the following arbitration-related cases: In Cont'l Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6 [e] [2]). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am by Marissa Miller
United States, while Debra Lyn Bassett previewed Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  This year I shared a panel entitled “Theories of Health Reform in the United States” with three excellent speakers, including CoOp co-guest blogger David Orentlicher (Rights to Health Care in the United States: Inherently Unstable), Abby Moncrieff  (Healthcare Federalism, Healthcare Rights, and the ACA), and Christina Ho (Recursivity and Health Reform in the US: An Application of Niklas… [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Robert J. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
There was no relevant federal law, nor any attempt to apply federal constitutional principles to bear on the validity of those state bans. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am by Sara Thorpe
Co. of State of Pa., __ Cal.4th __ (2010) (2010 Cal.Lexis 11679), the California Supreme Court held that where the insurance policies did not define the term “suit,” there was a duty to defend and indemnify a contractor that settled a government claim in an administrative adjudicative proceeding before the United States Department of Interior Board of Contract Appeals (“IBCA”). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
” At CNN Money, Brian Stelter anticipates the Court’s decision in American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]