Search for: "GRAY V DEFENSE" Results 421 - 440 of 573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2022, 1:41 pm by Holly Brezee
 § 9-11-68 and § 9-15-14 for bringing a substantially frivolous claim or unjustifiable defense. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Crawford, No. 06-5059 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is vacated and remanded for trial where: 1) the trial court reopened proceedings after the parties' summation and after the jury had been charged and had begun deliberating; 2) the government failed to present an adequate legal explanation that would justify the reopening of the case without a motion from a party; 3) the prosecution elicited testimony that defendant's counsel knew about the evidence in order to… [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am by Steve
County of Fairfax, Va., 907 F.2d 1459, 1469 (4th Cir. 1990); compare Gray v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm by Bexis
FCC, 512 U.S. 622, (1994); United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
 (Gray on Claims) District Court N D California: Compliance with accused industry standard does not justify joinder of defendants in a single action: Finisar Corporation v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:25 am by Phil Dixon
Application of the “silent witness rule” did not violate the defendant’s rights to a public trial or to present a defense U.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968) (only those jurors who cannot follow the law may be excused); Gray v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:20 pm
The Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog has a post (here) discussing other aspects of the Schoon v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
Supreme Court vacated the 2nd Circuit's ruling and instructed it to reconsider in light of its decision in Carey v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
Ryan (Southern Methodist University)   Criminal Justice 09: Criminal Law Stories Time: Fri, Jun 8 - 2:30pm - 4:15pm Place: HHV, TBA20  Session Participants: Chair: Donna Coker (University of Miami) The Story of Wanrow: Reasonableness, Gender, and Self-Defense *Donna Coker (University of Miami) Accomplice Liability and the Murderous Judge *Leo Katz (University of Pennsylvania) Robinson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:36 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Finally, the court noted that the defendant was legally under “no obligation to advise plaintiff who to sue,” Gray v. [read post]