Search for: "General Produce Co., LTD" Results 421 - 440 of 860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Finally, it is important to note that while financial backing or marketing insights may be essential for the success of a business venture those do not, by themselves, lead one to be an inventor. _______________________________ [1] RSC 1985, c P-4. [2] Weatherford Canada Ltd v Corlac Inc, 2010 FC 602, aff’d 2011 FCA 228 at para 104. [3] Weatherford Canada Ltd v Corlac Inc, 2010 FC 602 at para 238, aff’d 2011 FCA 228 at para 99, 95 CPR (4th) 101 (var’d on other… [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Jeremy pens on one of those rarities, ie Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies Co. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
"Mr McKenzie sold Kilmarnock-based Mackenzie Hall Holdings Ltd in 2012 to Virginia-based Portfiolio Recovery Assets for $51 million (£33.5m). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Monday 17 November 2014 the Court will hear the appeal of Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc v Tael One Partners Ltd involving the requirement to make a payment to the appellant in respect of a ‘Payment Premium’ in regards to repaying the capital of a loan. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
General Motors Corp., 65 P.3d 956, 968-69 (Ariz. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:48 am by Bruce Colbath
(IMS) alleging that the defendants falsely advertised their “generic” injectable epinephrine products. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 11:38 am by Doorey
 The leading case [Millhaven Fibres Ltd [1967] OLAA No. 4] sets out the test of what the employer must show as follows: 1. the conduct of the grievor harms the Company’s reputation or produce 2. the grievor’s behaviour renders the employee unable to perform his duties satisfactorily 3. the grievor’s behaviour leads to refusal, reluctance or inability of the other employees to work with him 4. the grievor has been guilty of a serious breach of the… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
* Tripp Trapp and the Third Dimension: a study in trade mark registrability Here’s the much awaited IPKat comment on  Case C‑205/13 Hauck GmbH & Co. [read post]