Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)" Results 421 - 440 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Having one party incognito but not the other can tilt the scales of justice in the direction of guilt by anonymous accusation, a prospect which would be just as abhorrent to civil litigation as it is to our criminal justice system. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
But pseudonymity generally, and one-sided pseudonymity particularly, is not without its risks. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
It has also begun to help the public understand the criminal justice system as more and more people participate as jurors. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Marumsco Christian Sch., 631 F.2d 1144 (4th Cir. 1980) (race discrimination in admission to schools); Brown v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
For about two decades, conservatives lagged behind liberals on such matters, but by the end of the 1980s the ideological valence of free speech had become scrambled, so that the lineup in Texas v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
 In February the Higher Regional Court Munich (OLG) decided that YouTube and its service cannot be called to account for any user generated copyright infringements. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
Because the Justices split 4-4, there was no opinion and the affirmance is not a precedent. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
One of those dots is Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1809 opinion in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
Supreme Court, was a devilishly clumsy piece of drafting that managed to generate multiple interpretations, from the most draconian to the most innocuous and silly. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by JURIST Staff
In a recent Supreme Court judgment, Salamat Mansha Mashih v The State, Justice Qazi Faez Isa expressed dismay over the urge to accuse others, and claimed that every second person pointed a finger and accused others of disparaging religion without recognizing and acknowledging that this was not a straightforward or common offence, but instead bears the death penalty. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
Justice Neil Gorsuch, who did not dissent from the denial, called for the Court to revisit Sullivan last year. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
But in the late 1980s and in the 1990s, this began to change. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The question of unions’ role in American life found its way into the Supreme Court earlier this month, in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:28 am by Katharine Baker
But if you asked that same group whom they would like to control the Supreme Court tomorrow – and they had to choose Finnis or Halley -   I bet more people would vote for Chief Justice Finnis. [read post]