Search for: "Grant v. Sullivan" Results 421 - 440 of 1,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm by Brian Shiffrin
    Consequently, a simple way to avoid exhaustion problems in leave applications is to include the sentence “Pursuant to O’Sullivan v Boerckel (526 U.S. 838 [1999]), it is expressly urged that leave to appeal be granted to review all issues raised in the briefs filed with the intermediate appellate court. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Using the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart v Dukes as its guide, the court also held the plaintiffs lacked commonality. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Palmer v Palmer decided that a motion by a petitioner to withdraw a writ granted by the Sullivan County Supreme Court for custody of children detained in Dutchess County. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
  Moreover, he maintains, the Supreme Court’s case law on this question is unsettled:  although the Court in Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The court declined, however, to adopt the magistrate’s determination to the extent that she found that a desk audit was equivalent to an administrative subpoena for the purposes of Fourth Amendment analysis and that the OFCCP did not apply neutral administrative criteria for selecting a certain BOA branch location for a compliance review (Bank of Am v Solis, July 2, 2014, Sullivan, E). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The court declined, however, to adopt the magistrate’s determination to the extent that she found that a desk audit was equivalent to an administrative subpoena for the purposes of Fourth Amendment analysis and that the OFCCP did not apply neutral administrative criteria for selecting a certain BOA branch location for a compliance review (Bank of Am v Solis, July 2, 2014, Sullivan, E). [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the employer’s motion for summary judgment was granted (Moncel v Sullivan’s of Indiana, Inc, May 13, 2014, Lawrence, W). [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 am by Wells Bennett
He charged the accused with crimes in connection with events in Yemen in early 2000 concerning the attempted attack on the USS THE SULLIVANS and the subsequent USS COLE bombing in October 2000, as well as an attempted attack on a French tanker, the M/V Limburg, in October 2002. [read post]