Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 421 - 440 of 36,568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 4:42 pm by Earl Drott
However, as demonstrated in a recent Texas ruling issued in a truck accident case, JNM Express, et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
The bill was significantly amended, ameliorating its harsh effect, now requiring MDE to make specific findings and consult with specified stakeholders in advance of promulgating any regulations negatively impacting the production of cement, all of which may in the end do more good than harm (.. just the opposite of what the bill as introduced proposed) in protecting the vital industrial sector of cement manufacturer from future GHG emission regulation. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
This lawsuit is a reminder that the kinds of improper relationships all too often revealed as part of the #MeToo movement are not only harmful for the victims of the misconduct, but harmful to the companies and firms that the perpetrators are involved with. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am by Guest Author
  However, the case would give Justice Gorsuch a chance to more fully connect the federalism canon and MQD (as he began to do in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:45 am by Unknown
Update on UK's “Safety of Rwanda” Bill:"UK Parliament approves Rwanda deportation bill, ending weeks of legislative stalemate," AP News, 22 April 2024 [text]UK: Airlines and aviation authorities should not facilitate unlawful removals to Rwanda, UN experts say (OHCHR, 22 April 2024) [text]The obstacles that could still stop flights to Rwanda from taking off (The Conversation, 23 April 2024) [text]Passing of the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill met with… [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
The regulation is part of an effort to preserve the reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. [read post]