Search for: "Harris v. Superior Court"
Results 421 - 440
of 458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
See, e.g., Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, administrative agencies have a “power of inquisition” whereby they can “investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even just because it wants assurance that it is not. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
It also changed the name of the Native Land Court to the Maori Land Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(IP finance) Global - Patents Study published in Science magazine ‘Promoting Intellectual Discovery: Patents Versus Markets’ concludes free markets superior to patent monopolies (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) Economic woes impact valuations, but not all sectors are suffering (Technology Transfer Tactics) Cancer Institute study show impact of patent age on deal probability (Technology Transfer Tactics) Should management be involved in patenting decisions? [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
(The challengers have appealed Raffensperger’s decision in the state courts, while Greene is appealing the federal court ruling refusing to bar the challenge before Raffensperger’s office.) [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 8:27 pm
In June, they applied to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to recognize the trade union as a bargaining agent based on a violation of their s. 2(d) rights, stating, “Rights enshrined in the Charter are for everyone, even lawyers. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
Milward v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:34 pm
Harris, supra, 908 A.2d 196, 221-223.) [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:56 am
P&G v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:33 am
These conditions were tested in the Texas judicial system with the case of Inwood North Homeowners’ Association Inc. v Charlie Harris, Jr., et al. and Rolando M. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:13 am
To that end, the bill expressly affirms or rejects specified judicial decisions in: Harris v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Daniel Webster is thought to have coined that phrase in his oral arguments in the Supreme Court case, McCulloch v. [read post]
